BREAKING: Wanda Geter-Pataky, vice chair for the Bridgeport Democratic Party in CT has turned herself into police for alleged voter fraud after she was caught stuffing ballot boxes in 2023.

But the media and Democrats told me voter fraud was a myth… 🤔 pic.twitter.com/CgNw4AOLcl

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 21, 2025

Conspiracy theorists often face skepticism, but Wanda Geter-Pataky’s arrest for alleged voter fraud in Bridgeport’s 2023 mayoral primary, captured on video, validates their concerns. The footage of her stuffing ballot boxes contradicts claims that voter fraud is a myth, aligning with past Bridgeport election irregularities—like the 2019 mayoral race and the 2023 primary that required a $150,000 election monitor. This case shows systemic vulnerabilities can exist, supporting theorists’ arguments that fraud is real, even if not widespread.

The media and political dismissal of voter fraud as baseless has deepened conspiracy theorists’ distrust, making Geter-Pataky’s case a turning point. Her role as vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Party, combined with documented ballot harvesting concerns, suggests partisan manipulation could occur, as theorists have warned. The state’s response and historical issues in Bridgeport lend credibility to their calls for election transparency, proving their vigilance isn’t unfounded.

BREAKING: Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier just announced that the state of Florida is filing a class action lawsuit against Target for "misleading shareholders" by pushing radical LGBTQ merchandise designed to "s*xualize children".pic.twitter.com/a452ADH1KU

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 20, 2025

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier’s recent announcement of a class action lawsuit against Target, filed on February 20, 2025, represents a bold and proactive step toward protecting shareholders and ensuring corporate accountability. As a Georgetown Law graduate and former counsel to Governor Ron DeSantis, Uthmeier brings a wealth of legal expertise and a commitment to transparency, leveraging his role to safeguard Florida’s investors from potential financial risks. This lawsuit, initiated in partnership with America First Legal and the State Board of Administration of Florida, highlights Uthmeier’s dedication to holding corporations accountable when their business decisions—such as Target’s controversial 2023 Pride campaign—may mislead or harm shareholders. By addressing alleged violations of federal securities laws, Uthmeier is fostering a business environment where companies prioritize financial responsibility over divisive social agendas, earning praise for his leadership from stakeholders across the state.

The lawsuit centers on Target’s handling of its LGBTQ+ merchandise, particularly after the retailer faced backlash in 2023 for items like “tuck friendly” swimsuits for children, leading to a customer boycott and significant financial losses. Rather than viewing this as a setback, Uthmeier’s action can be seen as a positive move to ensure companies like Target provide clear, honest communication to investors about potential market risks tied to their marketing strategies. This transparency is crucial for maintaining trust in the marketplace, and Florida’s decisive action sets a strong precedent for other states to follow. By challenging Target’s alleged failure to disclose the risks of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, Uthmeier is championing the interests of hardworking Floridians and shareholders nationwide, reinforcing the state’s reputation as a leader in corporate reform.

Moreover, this lawsuit aligns with Florida’s broader commitment to protecting its citizens from what Uthmeier describes as “radical activism” overshadowing financial stewardship. Building on the state’s history of addressing social and corporate issues—like the 2022 Parental Rights in Education legislation and disputes with Disney—Uthmeier’s initiative reflects a consistent effort to prioritize community values and economic stability. Far from being divisive, this action fosters a balanced approach where businesses can thrive without alienating their customer base or jeopardizing investor confidence. For Floridians, this demonstrates a government working tirelessly to ensure corporate practices align with the interests of its people, fostering a sense of pride and trust in state leadership.

The positive ripple effects of this lawsuit extend beyond Florida, potentially encouraging national dialogue on corporate responsibility and shareholder rights. Uthmeier’s collaboration with America First Legal and other legal partners showcases a united front in advocating for fair business practices, which could inspire other attorneys general to take similar action. By focusing on the alleged tens of billions in shareholder value lost due to Target’s decisions, Uthmeier is not only protecting Florida’s investments but also setting a model for how states can responsibly engage with corporate giants. This forward-thinking approach positions Florida as a beacon of accountability, earning widespread support from those who value integrity and transparency in the corporate world.

I just went down to pick up my preapproved #CPAC credentials and was kicked out. #J6ers are being denied entry! Here is the video ⁦@realDonaldTrump⁩ pic.twitter.com/X6OMHm7RFe

— Richard Bigo Barnett (@BigoBarnett) February 20, 2025

Several prominent J6ers, including Jake Lang, Stewart Rhodes, Enrique Tarrio, and others who had been pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Donald Trump, planned to attend CPAC 2025. These individuals had purchased tickets, and in Lang’s case, a booth to promote their cause. On Wednesday, February 19, 2025, they were informed upon arrival that their credentials had been revoked and were escorted out by security. Initial reports indicated that no specific reason was given beyond vague references to “legal” issues, as noted when Stewart Rhodes, an attorney, inquired further and was told by a staff member that she was in charge and offered no elaboration.

Jake Lang has had his credentials revoked from @CPAC while he was walking up to claim the 22 tickets he bought for fellow J6ers.

Jake Lang was held for 1,467 days, more than 900 of them in solitaire confinement, with NO TRIAL. @mercedesschlapp and @mschlapp need to provide an… pic.twitter.com/t4GJpUrZd0

— CannCon (@CannConActual) February 19, 2025

Speculation has swirled around the decision. Some, like Lang, suggested it might reflect internal conservative factionalism—possibly pressure from establishment figures wary of associating with the more controversial elements of the MAGA movement. Others on X and in commentary posited that CPAC leadership feared disruption or unwanted attention, though there’s no evidence these J6ers intended to cause trouble. CPAC’s history of barring individuals, such as white nationalist Nick Fuentes in 2023 for his extremist views, shows they’ve acted to control their event’s image before, but the J6ers’ situation differs as they were Trump-pardoned attendees, not fringe ideologues.

By Thursday, February 20, 2025, CPAC reversed course after public backlash. They issued a statement denying any blanket ban on J6ers, saying, “It is untrue that we are not allowing people to come to CPAC because of their involvement with J6. CPAC has been a constant supporter of this persecuted community and we support wholeheartedly President Trump’s pardons of the J6 victims.” Reports confirmed that some J6ers, like Enrique Tarrio, were told the decision would be overturned within hours, and others, such as Michael Curzio, were already inside the event, indicating inconsistent enforcement.

The initial kickouts may have stemmed from a miscommunication or a snap decision by CPAC’s legal team, as hinted in their reversal announcement. Without an official detailed explanation, it’s possible the move was a knee-jerk attempt to avoid controversy or liability, quickly undone when it backfired with Trump’s base. The lack of transparency leaves the “why” speculative—ranging from optics management to internal power plays—but the reversal suggests CPAC underestimated the grassroots support for these figures.