I just went down to pick up my preapproved #CPAC credentials and was kicked out. #J6ers are being denied entry! Here is the video ⁦@realDonaldTrump⁩ pic.twitter.com/X6OMHm7RFe

— Richard Bigo Barnett (@BigoBarnett) February 20, 2025

Several prominent J6ers, including Jake Lang, Stewart Rhodes, Enrique Tarrio, and others who had been pardoned or had their sentences commuted by President Donald Trump, planned to attend CPAC 2025. These individuals had purchased tickets, and in Lang’s case, a booth to promote their cause. On Wednesday, February 19, 2025, they were informed upon arrival that their credentials had been revoked and were escorted out by security. Initial reports indicated that no specific reason was given beyond vague references to “legal” issues, as noted when Stewart Rhodes, an attorney, inquired further and was told by a staff member that she was in charge and offered no elaboration.

Jake Lang has had his credentials revoked from @CPAC while he was walking up to claim the 22 tickets he bought for fellow J6ers.

Jake Lang was held for 1,467 days, more than 900 of them in solitaire confinement, with NO TRIAL. @mercedesschlapp and @mschlapp need to provide an… pic.twitter.com/t4GJpUrZd0

— CannCon (@CannConActual) February 19, 2025

Speculation has swirled around the decision. Some, like Lang, suggested it might reflect internal conservative factionalism—possibly pressure from establishment figures wary of associating with the more controversial elements of the MAGA movement. Others on X and in commentary posited that CPAC leadership feared disruption or unwanted attention, though there’s no evidence these J6ers intended to cause trouble. CPAC’s history of barring individuals, such as white nationalist Nick Fuentes in 2023 for his extremist views, shows they’ve acted to control their event’s image before, but the J6ers’ situation differs as they were Trump-pardoned attendees, not fringe ideologues.

By Thursday, February 20, 2025, CPAC reversed course after public backlash. They issued a statement denying any blanket ban on J6ers, saying, “It is untrue that we are not allowing people to come to CPAC because of their involvement with J6. CPAC has been a constant supporter of this persecuted community and we support wholeheartedly President Trump’s pardons of the J6 victims.” Reports confirmed that some J6ers, like Enrique Tarrio, were told the decision would be overturned within hours, and others, such as Michael Curzio, were already inside the event, indicating inconsistent enforcement.

The initial kickouts may have stemmed from a miscommunication or a snap decision by CPAC’s legal team, as hinted in their reversal announcement. Without an official detailed explanation, it’s possible the move was a knee-jerk attempt to avoid controversy or liability, quickly undone when it backfired with Trump’s base. The lack of transparency leaves the “why” speculative—ranging from optics management to internal power plays—but the reversal suggests CPAC underestimated the grassroots support for these figures.

@libsoftiktok exposes transgender activists allegedly running schemes to give hormone drugs to minors. This is drug trafficking specifically targeting children. Despite some states banning this, activists continue to push for early interventions. The change in administration could mean stricter policies, for protecting kids from what are premature and harmful treatments.

In a shocking revelation that underscores the inefficiencies and potential corruption within the federal government, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has uncovered that the Social Security Administration has been disbursing benefits to individuals listed as 150 years old. According to information circulating on social media and reported by conservative outlets, this blunder has led to the wastage of millions in taxpayer dollars. Critics argue this is a clear sign of bureaucratic bloat and the need for immediate reform in how government agencies manage public funds.

News sources have been quick to point out the absurdity of this situation, with some suggesting that these undoubtedly deceased might also be casting votes. The reception is one of deep skepticism towards government efficiency, with commentators on platforms like X highlighting this as just one of many examples of misuse of taxpayer money. The irony, as noted by these sources, is that while the government claims to be strapped for cash, it can apparently afford to pay out benefits to people who would be the oldest living humans by a wide margin, if thy were still alive.

This revelation has fueled calls for a comprehensive audit of the Social Security Administration and other federal agencies. Commentators are advocating for stricter oversight and the introduction of more rigorous identity verification processes to prevent such occurrences in the future. They argue that this incident is not just about financial waste but also about restoring public trust in government institutions which they claim have been mismanaged by those in power.

The timing of this discovery could not be more politically charged, coinciding with debates over government spending and social welfare programs. News sources are pointing out that this is a prime example of government inefficiency, pushing for significant reforms or even privatization of certain government functions. They see this as a clear indicator that without drastic changes, the American taxpayer will continue to bear the brunt of poorly managed government resources.